Common Law and Personal Sovereignty

This is an e-book I am writing under peer review it is not complete. (Cookies in use on this post. Enter at your own risk, some material may need citation or correction, is in beta)

Contents:

Chapter 1  Jurisprudence

Chapter 2 Citizenship, Rights, and Property

Chapter 3 Corporations, Robots, and Humans

Chapter 4 Money, Finance, Tax, and Banking

Chapter 5 World War

Chapter 6 Non Governmental Organizations

Chapter 7 United Nations

Chapter 8 Medical Tyranny

Chapter 9 Space Exploration

Chapter 10 Patents, Intellectual Property, and Planed Obsolesce

Reference

Chapter 1 Jurisprudence

Common law motions and procedures will take you on a 8 hour course to learn in very simple teaching what it is and where it came from. Later, I compiled some notes at the bottom to affirm the individual powers stated in this presentation. If I try to share this on any public video platform I get troll saying common law is case law. Sometimes common law is from case law but almost always is based on general public understanding of their inalienable rights.

Common law is natural law or fundamental law that everyone understands, it is the basis for all inalienable rights. it is not case law. This phrase is up for grabs to be officiated by courts that always lust for power.

The Federalist Papers : No. 78 excerpt

A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought, of course, to be preferred; or, in other words, the Constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.

Nor does this conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both; and that where the will of the legislature, declared in its statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people, declared in the Constitution, the judges ought to be governed by the latter rather than the former. They ought to regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws, rather than by those which are not fundamental.

The California Constitution Article 6 section 4 does not limit a county to having more than one Superior Court. It also can not define what a Superior Court is. Therefor I can establish a Court of Record as a Superior Court Judge without being appointed by legislature because I am a people serving as a judge in my own court already as provided in Section 15.

The right to trial by jury in a criminal case resides in both Article III, Section 2 of the federal Constitution (“The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury”) and the Sixth Amendment (“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury”).

The judicial branch has taken that right away?
According to the Supreme Court, the jury-trial right applies only when “serious” offenses are at hand—petty offenses don’t invoke it. For purposes of this right, a serious offense is one that carries a potential sentence of more than six months’ imprisonment. (Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).)

No, this is only a branch of government with limitations and opinions. It can not compel a law enforcement officer of a state to detain me or my assets unless I have been proven guilty under a statute or law in California if that is the jurisdiction.

Why is California an important example?

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 6 JUDICIAL
SEC. 1. The judicial power of this State is vested in the Supreme Court,
courts of appeal, and superior courts, all of which are courts of record.

What is a superior court? Me and my documentation before a grand jury. At this point as a class action counter claimant or a small claims counter claimant who is the real victim, as a sovereign Superior Court I can enforce fundamental and common law because Society wills it. No Judge can stop a Superior court proceeding in the State of California.

Why?
SEC. 9. The State Bar of California is a public corporation. Every person
admitted and licensed to practice law in this State is and shall be a member
of the State Bar except while holding office as a judge of a court of record

I am a Judge of my own court which is a court of record that can be established on my demand and will because the definitions of a superior court is not limited to those creations of the legislature or judiciary.

SEC. 10. SEC. 10. The Supreme Court, courts of appeal, superior courts, and their
judges have original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings. Those courts
also have original jurisdiction in proceedings for extraordinary relief in the
nature of mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition. The appellate division of
the superior court has original jurisdiction in proceedings for extraordinary
relief in the nature of mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition directed to the
superior court in causes subject to its appellate jurisdiction.
Superior courts have original jurisdiction in all other causes.
The court may make any comment on the evidence and the testimony and
credibility of any witness as in its opinion is necessary for the proper
determination of the cause.

Before arraignment can proceed the Superior Court has original jurisdiction to declare a writ and demand a jury trial

But what is a court of record, and why do I think I can be a judge in my own court?

SEC. 15. A person is ineligible to be a judge of a court of record unless for
10 years immediately preceding selection, the person has been a member of
the State Bar or served as a judge of a court of record in this State.

SEC 16. (b) Judges of superior courts shall be elected in their counties at general
elections except as otherwise necessary to meet the requirements of federal
law.

There you go my friend, I am a people and if natural law, fundamental law, which is common law, is infringed, I have the power to create a court of record and be the judge of the officials who claim to control me.

The United States Constitution defines laws the government must obey. It is common to the people as law. It is Federal Law and State Constitutions are subordinate to it, making it state law also.

Understanding Jurisdiction and Federal Income Tax. American National, constitutional, statutory, in correct jurisdictional application.

Citizenship, Rights, and Property

Chapter 8 Medical Tyranny

Which of these Medical Processes do you use?

So according to the statistics, 1 in every 100 Americans will die this year by a DRUG RELATED Cause!
See www.pharmamurders.com for an overview of how Big Pharma, the FDA and the MHRA work.
And look at the Big Pharma Death Clock: http://pharmadeathclock.com/
Cause Deaths / Year Location Source
Chemotherapy 1,000,000 USA View 
Iatrogenic Deaths 783,936 USA View 
Hospital Errors 440,000 USA View 
Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR) 210,000 USA View 
Bedsores 115,000 USA View 
Hospital Malnutrition 108,800 USA View 
Adverse Drug Reactions 106,000 USA View 
Medical Error 98,000 USA View 
Hospital Infections 75,000 USA View 
SSRIs 40,000 USA
Surgery-Related 32,000 USA View 
SuperBugs 23,000 USA View 
Prescription Drugs 22,767 USA View 
Drug-Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae 22,000 USA View (P.27)
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) 16,500 USA View 
Opioids (pain relievers) 16,235 USA View 
Clostridium Difficile (C.diff) 14,000 USA View (P.29)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) 11,285 USA View (P.31)
Benzodiazepines 6,973 USA View 
Anti-Depressant Overdoses 3,889 USA View 
Anti-Epileptic and Anti-Parkinsonism Drugs 1,717 USA View 
Extended Spectrum – Lactamase (ESBL) Producing Enterbacteriaceae 1,700 USA View (P.30)
Systemic and Hematological Drugs 1,591 USA View 
Anti-Psychotic and Neuroleptic Drugs 1,351 USA View 
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus 1,300 USA View (P.30)
Acetaminophen-Related Deaths 980 USA View 
Drug-Resistant Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhi 760 USA View (P.31)
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) 600 USA View (P.29)
Multi-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter 500 USA View (P.30)
Respiratory Drugs 487 USA View 
Drug-Resistant Non-Typhoidal Salmonella 450 USA View (P.31)
Clindamycin-Resistant Group B Streptococcus 440 USA View (P.32)
Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa 440 USA View (P.26)
Cardiovascular Drugs 354 USA View 
Barbiturates 296 USA View 
Autonomic Nervous System Drugs 263 USA View 
Anesthetics and Therapeutic Gases 195 USA View 
Erythromycin-Resistant Group A Streptococcus (GAS) 160 USA View (P.32)
Hormones, Insulins and Glucocorticoids 147 USA View 
Anti-Infectives 114 USA View 
Diuretics and Other Drugs, Medicaments, and Biological Substances 56 USA View 
Drug-Resistant Shigella 40 USA View (P.31)
Topical Drugs 34 USA View 
Legal Abortions (Deaths of Mothers) 10 USA View 

Oct 17, 2019 - We Found Over 700 Doctors Who Were Paid More Than a Million Dollars by Drug and Medical Device Companies. ProPublica has been tracking drug company spending on doctors since 2010. We just updated our database and found that companies are still paying private doctors huge sums of money... ...More than 2,500 physicians have received at least half a million dollars apiece from drugmakers and medical device companies in the past five years alone, a new ProPublica analysis of payment data shows. And that doesn’t include money for research or royalties from inventions... https://www.propublica.org/article/we-found-over-700-doctors-who-were-paid-more-than-a-million-dollars-by-drug-and-medical-device-companies #BSM

Reference Material:

The Global Sovereign's Handbook

Investigating the Federal Income Tax - Joseph R. Banister

Leave a Reply